1. Comprehension and content
- Presentation provided clear motivation, background, and significance to the research question.
- Presentation clearly described the research strategy/design and the results/findings of the research.
- Presentation clearly described the conclusions, outcomes, and impact of the research.
2. Engagement and communication
- The oration was delivered clearly, and the language was appropriate for a non-specialist audience.
- The PowerPoint slide was well-defined and enhanced the presentation.
- The presenter conveyed enthusiasm for their research and captured and maintained the audience’s attention.
PEOPLE’S CHOICE
An important aspect of the competition is the People’s Choice prize. Following all presentations, the audience is asked to vote on who they thought gave the most convincing 3MT presentation (based on their understanding of the criteria above).
A finalist can be the winner or runner-up and still receive the People’s Choice award.
【評選標準】
評審委員將依以下兩個主要面向進行評選。
- 理解與內容：
- 簡報內容是否清楚地呈現研究問題的動機、背景和重要性？
- 簡報內容是否清楚地描述研究策略/設計和研究結果/發現？
- 簡報內容是否清楚地描述研究結論、成果和影響?
- 表達與互動：
- 簡報表達是否清晰，語言適合非專業觀眾？
- 簡報投影片是否清晰明瞭，並加強演講效果?
- 講者是否展現對研究的熱情，成功吸引並維持觀眾注意力?
【觀眾票選獎】
比賽的重要項目之一是「觀眾票選獎」。所有參賽者完成簡報後，現場觀眾將根據上述評分標準，票選出最具說服力的三分鐘論文簡報。